000			01925nam a22002297a 4500
005			20240216175948.0
008			240216b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9780226100838
082			_a121.65 _bCHA
245			_aQuestions of evidence: _bproof, practice and persuasion across the disciplines
260			_bThe University of Chicago Press _aLondon _c1994
300			_avii, 518 p.
365			_aUSD _b40.00
520			_aBiologists, historians, lawyers, art historians, and literary critics all voice arguments in the critical dialogue about what constitutes evidence in research and scholarship. They examine not only the constitution and “blurring” of disciplinary boundaries, but also the configuration of the fact-evidence distinctions made in different disciplines and historical moments; the relative function of such concepts as “self-evidence,” “experience,” “test,” “testimony,” and “textuality” in varied academic discourses; and the way “rules of evidence” are themselves products of historical developments. The essays and rejoinders are by Terry Castle, Lorraine Daston, Carlo Ginzburg, Ian Hacking, Mark Kelman, R. C. Lewontin, Pierre Vidal-Naquet, Mary Poovey, Donald Preziosi, Simon Schaffer, Joan W. Scott, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, and Barbara Herrnstein Smith. The critical responses are by Lauren Berlant, James Chandler, Jean Comaroff, Arnold I. Davidson, Harry D. harootunian, Elizabeth Helsinger, Thomas C. Holt, Francoise Meltzer, Robert J. Richards, Lawrence Rothfield, Joel Snyder, Cass R. Sunstein, and William Wimsatt. (https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/Q/bo3627902.html)
650			_aEvidence _915969
650			_aCritical theory _915970
650			_aInterdisciplinary research _915971
700			_aChandler, James _914573
700			_aDavidson, Arnold I. _915972
700			_aHarootunian, Harry D. _915973
942			_cBK _2ddc
999			_c6333 _d6333